the surplus issue

for your perusal

9.13.2007

I am rather tired of discussing why my faith is reasonable. It’s not reasonable. I will never be convinced that it is reasonable. I could reason myself into the opposite conclusions. It’s only in the living that it makes sense, living my particular life and seeing the particular ways that God communicates to me. I find God in the particular, not the general. And reason is so general that it can be used to prove anything. Only God can give me certain experiences and ways of understanding. And I am the only one who can communicate those experiences. But it is not only in the particularity of personhood that God seems most real. Time and place are also significant. Flannery O’Connor did a beautiful job describing the strangeness of God’s ways through her depictions of the South in the early 20th century. If she were to attempt to describe God somewhere else at some other time, her stories would lose their power, because that was the place and time that she lived. That was the time and place in which she understood God. I don’t feel that I can comprehend very much of God as he was in the Old Testament. That is not my story. God is not reasonable and his ways are not our ways. But I can see some of the ways God worked in Chicago in 1998.

And Jesus’ story is my story too. He became incarnate and I am carnal. He died and I will die. He came into a very particular place – Bethlehem – into a very particular family and entered Jerusalem a particular way, because that was how it was to be. And perhaps there is something significant in the time he chose. Chesterton thinks there is. The Roman Empire had unified a great deal of the world, which allowed Christianity to spread rapidly. Paul was able to go to Rome and speak the same language. Going into all the world was a challenge, a life-threatening challenge, but the world was also more prepared to receive the message than perhaps it had ever been. Maybe Chesterton is wrong. But I like to think that Jesus chose a particular time. He did not come during the golden age of Israel, nor did he come during the worst persecution of the Jews. He came during a time of oppression when people longed for a political messiah. He came at a time of desperate need, but not a time so desperate that they were completely malleable.

Nothing is quite so generic as a new person or place. It takes time for things to become particular. It is only when you know someone very well that you can understand and appreciate their complexity and their beauty. The nuance of a picture becomes clear only after staring at it for a very long time. My current struggle is finding the particularity of this place and these people. I have not been in Osprey Point for very long, and I do not know people as particular individuals quite yet. I am still attempting to discern the underlying meaning of a sigh or the tone of a laugh. Meaningfulness comes with particularity, and thus far we have only been working towards particularity, seeing each other dimly. But I hope that soon we will see face to face.

3 Comments:

At 6:58 PM, Blogger Ryan said...

I can understand the reasonable faith frustration. I often feel the same way. I remember last year I spent a lot of my english classes with a particular woman talking about my beliefs and about God (it was in english, so it counts hehe). But in the end she wanted me to convince her of his existence or whatever and finally I had to tell her, listen faith is called faith because its very nature is unreasonable. I mean, I believe that my world view is true, therefore quite reasonable for the most part, but many of its very premises are based on unarguable, unprovable, and reasonably unknowable things. It is a bit frustrating in a discussion, and yet completely liberating as a belief system.
But I guess the fact that so many christians are obsessed with defending or proving things shows that not everyone feels liberated by the supernatural and has a hard time accepting it as being outside the natural rational order of things.

 
At 7:00 PM, Blogger Ryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 7:01 PM, Blogger Ryan said...

wow, it totally sounds like I was some sort of proselytizer in that last post.

I wasnt really... she was curious and I never mind talking about what I believe. She did say that I was the only person she had met who had sat down and clearly figured out why I believed what I did in a way that wasnt intellectually insulting to her. That was a cool complement.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home